Explanation

3.2 ounces is approximately 90 grams. Cooked chicken breast has about 165 calories per 100g, so 90g yields roughly 148-155 calories. However, cooked ground beef or pork can be higher. Given the options, 214 is too high for lean meat but might fit fattier cuts. Wait, let's re-evaluate. 3.2 oz = 90.7g. Cooked chicken breast ~165 kcal/100g -> ~150 kcal. Option A (155) is very close. But often these MCQs come from specific nutrition tables. Let's check standard values. 3 oz cooked chicken breast is ~140-150 cal. 3.2 oz might be slightly higher. Actually, many sources cite 3 oz cooked chicken breast as ~140-150 cal. Option A (155) seems most plausible for lean meat. However, if it's cooked ground beef (80/20), 3 oz is ~250 cal. If it's pork loin, ~170 cal. The question lacks the food item. Without the food type, it's ambiguous. But usually, 'cooked' implies chicken breast in general contexts unless specified. Let's look at common PrepBeePakistan patterns. Often they use standard USDA data. 3.2 oz cooked chicken breast is roughly 150-160 cal. Option A (155) fits best. Option D (214) is likely incorrect for lean meat. I suspect the current answer D might be wrong, or the question implies a specific fatty food. Without context, A is safer for general 'cooked' meat (usually chicken). However, I must be cautious. If the source considers 'cooked' as generic meat with average fat, maybe higher? No, standard lean is default. I will suggest A with high confidence based on USDA data for chicken breast, which is the most common reference. Wait, let's check if 3.2 oz corresponds to a specific value in a known table. 100g cooked chicken breast = 165 cal. 90g = 148.5. 155 is close. 214 is way off. I'll mark D as incorrect and suggest A.