Can Pakistan's mediation still avert a wider US-Iran war?
Weeks of US strikes and Iranian retaliation have pushed the conflict toward a dangerous new phase, even as both sides signal they still want a way back to the table -- with Pakistan working to broker it.
- Publication
- Pakistan Observer
- Author
- Tariq Aqil
- Publication date
- 27 Jul 2026
Source citation: Tariq Aqil. “Renewed US-Iran conflict.” Pakistan Observer, 27 Jul 2026.
Original article · Source clipping 9
Renewed US-Iran conflict
By Tariq Aqil
Pakistan Observer · 27 Jul 2026
For almost a fortnight now, the United States has maintained a sustained and relentless campaign of bombings and aerial strikes against Iran and, in return, Iran has replied with missile and drone strikes on American bases in the region. The major escalation in violence between Iran and the US points to a very dangerous new phase in this war in the Middle East. The deep differences over the disposition of the Strait of Hormuz have sparked this latest wave of strikes. This new conflict is now spiraling out of control and could possibly become a much wider conflict in the region, spreading chaos all over the Middle East.
In spite of the escalating violence, surprisingly, both America and Iran are openly signaling a return to diplomacy and dialogue to bring an end to the present conditions. The days ahead will be watched carefully by all concerned. Will the USA and Iran continue the escalation, leading to an all-out wider war? Or will the backdoor diplomacy and mediation efforts by Pakistan result in silencing the guns and getting the belligerents around a conference table once again in Pakistan or Geneva? The period of the past fortnight witnessed a dramatic beating of the war drums and a steep escalation in the conflict that led to the first American fatalities and the imposition of a naval blockade by the US on Iran, along with Iranian attacks on shipping through the critical Strait of Hormuz and expanding target sets that included civilian infrastructure. The catalyst for this latest violent exchange centered on the Strait of Hormuz, but now this new conflict has expanded beyond the strategic choke point in the seas of Iran and the Gulf region. Propelled by the self-perpetuating logic of escalation, the conflict could now evolve in many ways not anticipated or controlled by the USA or Iran. During the present offensive operations, the American attacks have targeted Iranian infra-structure and expanded all over Iranian territory. Iran has responded by hitting targets in the countries of the Gulf region, for example, striking a desalination plant and an electrical plant in Kuwait. Iran has also expanded its strike range by hitting Saudi Arabia and targeting Aqaba on the Red Sea in southern Jordan. Speculation is that there will be a further escalation in the hostilities. Following a July 1 National Security Council meeting that reportedly considered several military options, the US has deployed more military jets in the region, indicating a much broader attack.
Speculation is that an attack on Pickaxe Mountain, Iran’s super-secret nuclear facility or land operations on Kharg Island, where Iran has major oil export facilities, are possible, though both carry significant risks for the USA. It appears that Iran, too, is in the mood for further escalation. The Iranian leadership has asked its proxy in Yemen, the Houthi militia, to close the Bab al-Mandab Strait. They could also resort to more deadly attacks on Gulf energy infrastructure and global energy markets, including the Red Sea port of Yanbu, a critical alternative export route for Saudi Arabia during disruptions in the Strait of Hormuz. Israel, too, appears to be bracing for an Iranian attack that will project Israel into the conflict once again. There is a fear that some Gulf countries could jump into the fray against Iran, further expanding the war. So far, the Gulf States have meticulously avoided direct confrontation with Iran, looking for paths of de-escalation. Their aims could shift should they feel threatened and cornered by Iranian aggression against them.
Over the last two weeks, there has been a rapid diplomatic unravelling. First, after the NATO summit on July 8, there was an Iranian drone strike on shipping in the Strait and Donald Trump promptly declared that the Islamabad MoU was finished and called the Iranians “scum.” Iran responded by announcing the suspension of its MoU commitments. Then Iran announced the suspension of its MoU commitments on July 18, with Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei saying President Trump’s signature was “worthless and invalid.” Iran has also accompanied its anti-Trump rhetoric with provocative framing; a prominently placed mural in downtown Tehran depicts the president in an open coffin. This latest escalation has only deepened the distrust between the two sides, undermining faith in the agreement and raising the bar for successful diplomacy in the next round. The major mediator in this war is Pakistan and it is making every effort behind the scenes to ease tensions and make way for another ceasefire and another round of talks. Iran has announced that it has received several proposals from the mediator, which are under review. Pakistan remains committed to the MoU and continues to urge both parties to respect the conditions of the MoU and get back to the negotiating table to give diplomacy another chance.
—The writer is Professor of History, based in Islamabad [email protected] .
01 / The briefing
The writer describes a sharp escalation in the US-Iran conflict: a sustained US campaign of bombings and airstrikes against Iran, met with Iranian missile and drone strikes on American bases, following disputes over control of the Strait of Hormuz. He frames this as a dangerous new phase, warning the conflict is 'spiraling out of control' and could widen into a broader regional war -- even as both sides, surprisingly, continue signalling openness to renewed diplomacy.
Central to the piece is Pakistan's role as mediator. The writer traces a fast-moving and fragile diplomatic sequence: an Iranian drone strike on shipping in the strait prompted the US to declare the 'Islamabad MoU' finished; Iran responded by suspending its own MoU commitments, with its Supreme Leader calling the US president's signature 'worthless and invalid.' Despite this rapid unravelling, the writer notes Pakistan remains committed to the agreement and continues working behind the scenes toward another ceasefire.
The piece closes on a pointed argument: that Pakistan's mediation may be the last realistic route to preventing a wider war, given how quickly trust between Washington and Tehran has broken down and how the conflict's underlying dynamics -- expanding target sets, regional spillover risks into Gulf states, Israel bracing for possible involvement -- could escalate the war well beyond its current scope if diplomacy fails.
Why it matters
A timely case study in conflict escalation, third-party mediation and regional security dynamics -- relevant to International Relations and Current Affairs answers on the Strait of Hormuz, US-Iran relations and Pakistan's diplomatic positioning in the Gulf.
02 / Key arguments
What should enter your answer?
- 1
Disputes over control of the Strait of Hormuz are identified as the immediate catalyst for the latest escalation.
- 2
Both the US and Iran continue signalling willingness to negotiate even while military action escalates -- a sign the conflict remains unresolved rather than decided.
- 3
Pakistan's mediating role, and the fragile 'Islamabad MoU,' sit at the centre of the piece's account of how a wider war might still be averted.
- 4
The writer treats the conflict's trajectory as genuinely uncertain, citing self-perpetuating escalation dynamics that neither side may fully control.
03 / Evidence desk
Facts worth retaining
- Disputes over the Strait of Hormuz
- Immediate catalyst cited
- Pakistan
- Mediator identified
- The 'Islamabad MoU'
- Contested agreement
- Almost a fortnight
- Duration of the latest escalation (at writing)
04 / Vocabulary
Use the language precisely
- Escalation
- A progressive increase in the scale or intensity of a conflict.
- Mediator
- A neutral third party that helps opposing sides negotiate toward an agreement.
- Naval blockade
- A military operation that seals off sea access to prevent the movement of ships.
- De-escalation
- Deliberate action taken to reduce the intensity of a conflict.
05 / Syllabus map
06 / Think further
Questions for discussion
Why might both sides in an escalating conflict still publicly signal willingness to negotiate?
What risks does Pakistan take on by acting as mediator in a conflict of this scale?
How could disputes over a single strait escalate into a wider regional war?
Community comments will be enabled after moderation and reporting controls are ready.
More briefings
Could Saudi-US nuclear cooperation build another Aramco?
A new civil-nuclear agreement between Riyadh and Washington echoes the 1933 oil concession that created Aramco -- and could reshape Saudi Arabia's post-oil energy strategy.
Reading Pakistan’s economic direction beyond the headline number
A guided reading of the Economic Survey’s growth story, sector mix, and policy trade-offs.
Why monetary policy moves before the economy does
Understanding a policy-rate decision through inflation expectations, energy risk, and delayed transmission.